Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
MOR 07 Sep 03:30 am FT. LAUDERDALE

Lineup Out

Church Street Park
Minor League Cricket

Best Player Combinations For
MOR vs FT. LAUDER

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

MOR vs FT. LAUDER

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best MOR Player Combinations

Best MOR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Padala BOW MOR
A Bolisetty AR MOR
S Stanley BAT MOR
A Gupta AR MOR
R Nannan AR MOR
R Wiggins BAT MOR
C Barnwell BAT MOR
G Baldwin AR MOR
T Griffith BAT MOR
A Padala
A Bolisetty
S Stanley
A Gupta
R Nannan
R Wiggins
C Barnwell
G Baldwin
T Griffith
1
1 player
A Padala
2 player
A Padala
Strong Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
A Padala
2 player
A Bolisetty
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Padala
2 player
S Stanley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Padala
2 player
A Gupta
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Padala
2 player
R Nannan
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Padala
2 player
R Wiggins
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
A Padala
2 player
C Barnwell
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Padala
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
A Padala
2 player
T Griffith
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
A Padala
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
A Bolisetty
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
S Stanley
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
A Gupta
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
R Nannan
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
R Wiggins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
C Barnwell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
T Griffith
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
A Padala
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
A Bolisetty
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
S Stanley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
A Gupta
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
R Nannan
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
R Wiggins
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
T Griffith
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
A Padala
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
A Bolisetty
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
S Stanley
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
A Gupta
Strong Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
R Nannan
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
R Wiggins
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
C Barnwell
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
T Griffith
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
A Padala
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
A Bolisetty
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
S Stanley
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
A Gupta
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
R Nannan
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
R Wiggins
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
C Barnwell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
T Griffith
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
A Padala
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
A Bolisetty
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
S Stanley
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
A Gupta
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
R Nannan
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
R Wiggins
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.34
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
T Griffith
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
A Padala
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
A Bolisetty
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
S Stanley
Weak Negative Correlation
0.03
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
A Gupta
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
R Nannan
Positive Correlation
-0.34
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
R Wiggins
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
C Barnwell
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
T Griffith
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
A Padala
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
A Bolisetty
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
S Stanley
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
A Gupta
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
R Nannan
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
R Wiggins
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
C Barnwell
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
G Baldwin
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
T Griffith
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
A Padala
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
A Bolisetty
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
S Stanley
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
A Gupta
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
R Nannan
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
R Wiggins
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
C Barnwell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
T Griffith
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Bolisetty and R Nannan together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Nannan and C Barnwell together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 T Griffith

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Barnwell 0.54
R Nannan 0.52
A Bolisetty 0.16
R Wiggins 0.05
A Padala 0.04
S Stanley 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
A Gupta -0.18

2 A Bolisetty

AR
Similar Perfomance
R Nannan 0.62
A Padala 0.44
C Barnwell 0.44
A Gupta 0.35
R Wiggins 0.24
T Griffith 0.16
S Stanley 0.05

3 A Padala

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Nannan 0.47
A Bolisetty 0.44
S Stanley 0.35
R Wiggins 0.24
A Gupta 0.2
T Griffith 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
C Barnwell -0.13

4 C Barnwell

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Nannan 0.62
T Griffith 0.54
A Bolisetty 0.44
A Gupta 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
R Wiggins -0.34
S Stanley -0.23
A Padala -0.13

5 R Wiggins

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Stanley 0.28
A Padala 0.24
A Bolisetty 0.24
A Gupta 0.15
T Griffith 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
C Barnwell -0.34
R Nannan -0.18

Best FT. LAUDER Player Combinations

Best FT. LAUDER Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Khan BOW FT. LAUDERDALE
A Brown BOW FT. LAUDERDALE
M Rampersaud WK FT. LAUDERDALE
T Chanderpaul BAT FT. LAUDERDALE
I Rajah BAT FT. LAUDERDALE
R Persaud-l BOW FT. LAUDERDALE
K Stoute AR FT. LAUDERDALE
G Sharma BAT FT. LAUDERDALE
B Gayle AR FT. LAUDERDALE
A Khan
A Brown
M Rampersaud
T Chanderpaul
I Rajah
R Persaud-l
K Stoute
G Sharma
B Gayle
1
1 player
A Khan
2 player
A Khan
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
A Khan
2 player
A Brown
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Khan
2 player
M Rampersaud
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Khan
2 player
T Chanderpaul
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Khan
2 player
I Rajah
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
A Khan
2 player
R Persaud-l
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Khan
2 player
K Stoute
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Khan
2 player
G Sharma
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Khan
2 player
B Gayle
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
A Brown
2 player
A Khan
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Brown
2 player
A Brown
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Brown
2 player
M Rampersaud
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Brown
2 player
T Chanderpaul
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Brown
2 player
I Rajah
No Correlation
0.68
1 player
A Brown
2 player
R Persaud-l
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Brown
2 player
K Stoute
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Brown
2 player
G Sharma
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
A Brown
2 player
B Gayle
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Rampersaud
2 player
A Khan
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Rampersaud
2 player
A Brown
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Rampersaud
2 player
M Rampersaud
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Rampersaud
2 player
T Chanderpaul
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Rampersaud
2 player
I Rajah
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Rampersaud
2 player
R Persaud-l
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Rampersaud
2 player
K Stoute
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Rampersaud
2 player
G Sharma
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Rampersaud
2 player
B Gayle
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Chanderpaul
2 player
A Khan
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Chanderpaul
2 player
A Brown
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Chanderpaul
2 player
M Rampersaud
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Chanderpaul
2 player
T Chanderpaul
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Chanderpaul
2 player
I Rajah
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
T Chanderpaul
2 player
R Persaud-l
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
T Chanderpaul
2 player
K Stoute
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Chanderpaul
2 player
G Sharma
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
T Chanderpaul
2 player
B Gayle
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
I Rajah
2 player
A Khan
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
I Rajah
2 player
A Brown
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
I Rajah
2 player
M Rampersaud
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
I Rajah
2 player
T Chanderpaul
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
I Rajah
2 player
I Rajah
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
I Rajah
2 player
R Persaud-l
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
I Rajah
2 player
K Stoute
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Rajah
2 player
G Sharma
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
I Rajah
2 player
B Gayle
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
R Persaud-l
2 player
A Khan
No Correlation
0.68
1 player
R Persaud-l
2 player
A Brown
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Persaud-l
2 player
M Rampersaud
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
R Persaud-l
2 player
T Chanderpaul
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Persaud-l
2 player
I Rajah
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Persaud-l
2 player
R Persaud-l
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Persaud-l
2 player
K Stoute
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Persaud-l
2 player
G Sharma
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
R Persaud-l
2 player
B Gayle
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Stoute
2 player
A Khan
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Stoute
2 player
A Brown
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
K Stoute
2 player
M Rampersaud
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
K Stoute
2 player
T Chanderpaul
Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
K Stoute
2 player
I Rajah
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Stoute
2 player
R Persaud-l
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Stoute
2 player
K Stoute
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Stoute
2 player
G Sharma
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
K Stoute
2 player
B Gayle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Sharma
2 player
A Khan
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Sharma
2 player
A Brown
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Sharma
2 player
M Rampersaud
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Sharma
2 player
T Chanderpaul
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Sharma
2 player
I Rajah
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Sharma
2 player
R Persaud-l
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Sharma
2 player
K Stoute
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Sharma
2 player
G Sharma
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Sharma
2 player
B Gayle
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
B Gayle
2 player
A Khan
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
B Gayle
2 player
A Brown
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
B Gayle
2 player
M Rampersaud
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Gayle
2 player
T Chanderpaul
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
B Gayle
2 player
I Rajah
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
B Gayle
2 player
R Persaud-l
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
B Gayle
2 player
K Stoute
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Gayle
2 player
G Sharma
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Gayle
2 player
B Gayle
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Brown and M Rampersaud together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick A Brown and R Persaud-l together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Brown and G Sharma together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Rampersaud and T Chanderpaul together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Rampersaud and R Persaud-l together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick M Rampersaud and G Sharma together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Chanderpaul and G Sharma together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Persaud-l and G Sharma together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Persaud-l and B Gayle together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Sharma and B Gayle together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 K Stoute

AR
Similar Perfomance
I Rajah 0.54
T Chanderpaul 0.48
B Gayle 0.24
M Rampersaud 0.15
R Persaud-l 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
A Khan -0.14

2 T Chanderpaul

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Rampersaud 0.7
G Sharma 0.7
I Rajah 0.5
K Stoute 0.48
B Gayle 0.18
A Khan 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Persaud-l -0.05

3 I Rajah

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Stoute 0.54
T Chanderpaul 0.5
M Rampersaud 0.3
B Gayle 0.21
A Brown 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
R Persaud-l -0.14
A Khan -0.11

4 A Khan

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Sharma 0.4
B Gayle 0.17
T Chanderpaul 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Persaud-l -0.15
K Stoute -0.14
I Rajah -0.11
A Brown -0.02

5 B Gayle

AR
Similar Perfomance
G Sharma 0.7
R Persaud-l 0.62
M Rampersaud 0.5
A Brown 0.44
K Stoute 0.24
I Rajah 0.21
T Chanderpaul 0.18
A Khan 0.17

Best MOR Player Combinations

Best MOR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Padala BOW MOR
A Bolisetty AR MOR
S Stanley BAT MOR
A Gupta AR MOR
R Nannan AR MOR
R Wiggins BAT MOR
C Barnwell BAT MOR
G Baldwin AR MOR
T Griffith BAT MOR
A Padala
A Bolisetty
S Stanley
A Gupta
R Nannan
R Wiggins
C Barnwell
G Baldwin
T Griffith
1
1 player
A Padala
2 player
A Padala
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Padala
2 player
A Bolisetty
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Padala
2 player
S Stanley
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Padala
2 player
A Gupta
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Padala
2 player
R Nannan
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Padala
2 player
R Wiggins
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Padala
2 player
C Barnwell
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Padala
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Padala
2 player
T Griffith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
A Padala
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
A Bolisetty
Strong Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
S Stanley
Strong Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
A Gupta
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
R Nannan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
R Wiggins
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
C Barnwell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Bolisetty
2 player
T Griffith
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
A Padala
No Correlation
-1
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
A Bolisetty
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
S Stanley
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
A Gupta
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
R Nannan
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
R Wiggins
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
C Barnwell
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Stanley
2 player
T Griffith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
A Padala
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
A Bolisetty
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
S Stanley
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
A Gupta
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
R Nannan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
R Wiggins
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
C Barnwell
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Gupta
2 player
T Griffith
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
A Padala
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
A Bolisetty
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
S Stanley
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
A Gupta
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
R Nannan
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
R Wiggins
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
C Barnwell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Nannan
2 player
T Griffith
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
A Padala
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
A Bolisetty
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
S Stanley
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
A Gupta
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
R Nannan
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
R Wiggins
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
C Barnwell
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Wiggins
2 player
T Griffith
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
A Padala
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
A Bolisetty
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
S Stanley
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
A Gupta
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
R Nannan
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
R Wiggins
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
C Barnwell
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Barnwell
2 player
T Griffith
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
A Padala
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
A Bolisetty
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
S Stanley
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
A Gupta
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
R Nannan
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
R Wiggins
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
C Barnwell
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
G Baldwin
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Baldwin
2 player
T Griffith
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
A Padala
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
A Bolisetty
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
S Stanley
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
A Gupta
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
R Nannan
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
R Wiggins
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
C Barnwell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
G Baldwin
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Griffith
2 player
T Griffith
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick R Nannan and T Griffith together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Padala and R Nannan together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Padala and C Barnwell together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Bolisetty and S Stanley together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Stanley and R Nannan together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Stanley and C Barnwell together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Nannan and R Wiggins together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 T Griffith

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Nannan 0.7
C Barnwell 0.42
A Bolisetty 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
S Stanley -0.33
A Padala -0.25
A Gupta -0.14

2 A Bolisetty

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Barnwell 0.42
A Gupta 0.35
R Nannan 0.35
T Griffith 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
S Stanley -1
R Wiggins -0.14
A Padala -0.09

3 A Padala

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Wiggins 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
R Nannan -0.7
C Barnwell -0.7
A Gupta -0.35
T Griffith -0.25
A Bolisetty -0.09

4 C Barnwell

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Nannan 0.7
A Bolisetty 0.42
T Griffith 0.42
A Gupta 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
A Padala -0.7
S Stanley -0.7
R Wiggins -0.42

5 R Nannan

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Barnwell 0.7
T Griffith 0.7
A Bolisetty 0.35
A Gupta 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
A Padala -0.7
S Stanley -0.7
R Wiggins -0.7

Best FT. LAUDER Player Combinations

Best FT. LAUDER Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

More on PL Labs

MOR vs FT. LAUDER

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only